The panels below are eleven Structural-Observatory instruments plus a companion Compiler Tomography pair. Instruments 1–7 are exact, deterministic witnesses of Theorems 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 (or auxiliary dissociations). Instruments 8–11 are fixed-seed Monte Carlo witnesses of Theorem 7 across four inductive-bias classes (linear, sparse-linear, iVAE, interventional). Results load live from the committed experiment summaries.
Loading results…
Papers & notes
- Download PDF The Structural Intelligence Conjecture — Representation as a Stochastic Fibration, with Eleven Instruments (Aug 3, 2026, ~7pp)
- Markdown source of the umbrella paper — the full derivation of Theorems 1–7, the SIC-A/B/C-a/C-b/C-c honest split with C-c positively resolved for four inductive-bias classes, and the extended ten-construct programme.
- Compiler-Tomography PDF Compiler Tomography (third companion paper; Theorems CT-1 and CT-2 — MDL identifiability of a shared compiler and monotone-reward ecology dynamics)
- Sufficient-Antecedents PDF Sufficient Antecedents for Cross-Task Stability (fourth companion paper; Theorem SA-1 — taxonomy showing each known identifiability escape route [linear ICA, sparse-linear ICA, iVAE, interventional CRL] is one way of populating Theorem 4's antecedent)
- Abstraction-Frontier PDF Abstraction Frontier (fifth companion paper; Theorems AF-1 and AF-2 — Pareto set of quotients trading sufficiency, dynamical closure, coding cost, control regret is an antichain, reducing to CSS when a common sufficient statistic exists)
- Alignment-as-Ensemble-Governance PDF Alignment as Ensemble Governance (sixth companion paper; Theorems AG-1 and AG-2 — viability- region survival bounds Pr[q(Xt) ∈ V for all t ≤ T] ≥ (1−β)T under bounded per-step leakage; fiber-audit is the natural check)
- Theory-Atlas PDF Theory Atlas (seventh companion paper; Theorems TA-1 and TA-2 — cocycle condition iff gluing; failure taxonomy: glue / phase transition / missing latent)
- Causal-Semantics PDF Causal Semantics (eighth companion paper; Theorems CS-1 and CS-2 — Ψ-equivalence is a congruence; meaning quotient is the coarsest common sufficient statistic on messages, orthogonal to co-occurrence embeddings)
- Representation-Repair-Calculus PDF Representation-Repair Calculus (ninth companion paper; Theorems RR-1 and RR-2 — eight canonical failure-signature → minimal-lift pairs are well-defined; independent lifts compose)
- Autocatalytic-Artwork PDF Autocatalytic Artwork (tenth companion paper; Theorems AA-1 and AA-2 — Bayesian audience competence is monotone under posterior update; the autocatalytic dynamic is exactly the compiler-ecology of CT-2)
-
Foundations PDF
Structural Intelligence — Foundations
(eleventh companion paper; derives SIC-A finite-discrete
existence from T1 + P3 + CS-2, turning the master fibration
from posit to theorem — Lean-verified as
sic_a_finite_discrete, zero new axioms) -
Covering-Learnability PDF
Structural Intelligence — Covering Learnability
(twelfth companion paper; SIC-C-c conditional meta-theorem
via T5-rate ∘ T6 covering reduction; Locatello 2019
is the sharp boundary. Lean-verified as
sicc_covering_meta, zero new axioms) - Formal companion note — the working development of the framework (concern-as-fiber-geometry, the ten constructs, Core ⊂ Shell agent architecture) that the paper distils.
- Concern-Fiber-Geometry PDF Concern as Fiber Geometry (companion paper; Theorems CG-1 and CG-2 with an exact worked example — the Fisher-metric machinery of concern on top of the master fibration)
- Meta-framework note — the underlying synthesis across category-theoretic design, a proved genomic specification limit, machine-found proofs, Wigner, and structural realism, with retrieval provenance for every source.
-
Instrument source code
— each of the six instruments below has a folder in
experiments/withcore.py,experiment.py, a pre-registration, an experiment manifest, and aPROVENANCE.mdcard.
Machine-checked Lean 4 proofs
All named theorems in the twelve-paper family are now Lean-formalised, including the two conjectural residuals turned conditional theorems (SIC-A finite derivation, SIC-C-c covering meta-theorem).
Two isolated Lean 4 projects: a fast pure-core lane
(formal/structural-intelligence/,
no mathlib, builds in ~3 s) covers the combinatorial and algebraic cores;
a mathlib companion
(formal/structural-intelligence-mathlib/,
mathlib v4.32.2, ~10–15 min cold CI with cache) covers everything that
needs the real numbers, exp/log, or exponential-family calculus.
Zero sorrys across both projects; two explicitly-cited project axioms
(Halmos–Savage 1949 packaging for T1, Shannon 1959 KKT converse for T2).
-
Pure-core lane (algebraic / combinatorial cores):
Theorem 4 (common-sufficient-screen functional refinement),
Theorem 5-core (union bound + coupon-collector pigeonhole),
Theorem 6 (refinement composition),
Theorems CT-1, CS-1/2, SA-1, AF-1/2, AG-2, TA-1, RR-2, AA-2. All in
StructuralIntelligence/*.lean. 17 named-headline theorems total. -
Mathlib companion (real-analytic / measure-theoretic):
Theorem 5-rate (quantitative sample complexity, N ≥ c·M·log(M/ε) ⇒ M·exp(−N/(c·M)) ≤ ε),
Theorem 1 (Halmos–Savage minimal sufficient statistic; sufficiency-iff-LR-factors proved in full, packaging step cited),
Theorem 2 (Shannon R–D closed form for uniform Hamming; achievability proved, converse cited),
Proposition 3 (Coarsen ⊣ Refine adjunction, both triangle identities),
Theorem AG-1 (Bernoulli survival bound, joint product form),
Theorem CT-2 (Chebyshev-weighted correlation ⇒ Boltzmann raises expected reward),
Theorem CG-1 (Fisher matrix = Cov[T] in exponential families),
Theorem CG-2 (concern-form holonomy = ε·A via discrete Green's theorem),
Theorem AA-1 (Bayes-mixture log-likelihood monotone under refinement),
sic_a_finite_discrete(SIC-A derivation from T1 + P3 + CS-2 in the finite discrete positive-support case),sicc_covering_meta(SIC-C-c conditional meta-theorem from T5-rate ∘ T6 covering reduction). All inStructuralIntelligenceMathlib/*.lean. 19 named-headline theorems total. -
Axiom footprint (from
#print axiomson every headline): 33 of 36 headlines (SIC-A finite existence and the SIC-C-c meta-theorem contribute zero new axioms) depend only on the mathlib-standard axiom set[propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound]. Two headlines (T1 minimality, T2 converse) each add one explicitly-cited project axiom pointing to the classical result Mathlib does not yet expose. No hiddensorrys anywhere.
Fiber Finder — representation search
Over a Boolean world with a known invariant, search a lattice of quotient maps. Only sufficiency-then-compression recovers the ground-truth invariant: pure description-length minimization collapses the obstruction, and pure accuracy maximization never compresses. Sufficiency, description length, and accuracy dissociate.
Structure Compiler — one invariant, many embodiments
One abstract structure (accumulation → phase transition → hysteresis)
is compiled into music, a visual field, text, and spatial navigation. Each
medium's readback recovers the identical trajectory
(qi ∘ Fi = id) —
verified structural identity, not mood matching.
Agency Science — symbolic causation
Treat a symbolic model as an operation on a system's future-trajectory distribution. Signal, control, knowledge, and agency dissociate: a false-credit condition improves the outcome with zero true do-effect and miscalibrated self-attribution; a brittle controller controls without transferring. No single scalar identifies agency.
Cross-task Sufficiency — Theorem 4 witness
On a 4-bit Boolean world with latent
Z = joint(parity{0,1}, parity{2,3}), enumerate a rich
quotient lattice for two task families exactly. For the family whose members
all factor through Z, the coarsest common sufficient
statistic is exactly Z (image 4, strictly smaller than
|X| = 16). For the family that reveals individual bits, it
collapses to the identity. Combining tasks strictly
tightens the required partition: family CSS is finer than any single task's
minimal sufficient statistic. Cross-task stability is a property of the
task family, not of the system.
Cross-task Learnability — Theorem 5 witness
Same 4-bit world, same shared task family, now measuring
sample complexity. Recovery of Z under
empirical common-sufficient clustering reduces to a coupon-collector
question on the fibre partition; its exact probability is computed by
inclusion–exclusion over all 2M = 16
subsets (no Monte Carlo, no seed). At Theorem 5's bound
N ≥ ⌈c⋅M⋅ln(M/ε)⌉
with ε=0.05, exact recovery is 0.9775
(uniform, c=1, N=18) and 0.9756
(skewed, c=2, N=36) — both above
1 − ε=0.95. Recovery is zero below
M=4 (pigeonhole) and monotone in N. Discrete-case
learnability is a theorem with a numerically sharp constant.
Continuous-case Learnability — Theorem 6 witness
Ambient X = [0,1]2 quantised to a
16×16 grid; latent Z a coarser r×r
(for dZ = 2) or r×1 (for
dZ = 1) grid at resolutions
r ∈ {4, 8, 16}. Exact recovery
probability at Theorem 6's bound is computed by an O(N⋅M)
DP recursion, numerically stable up to M = 256 where the
log-domain inclusion–exclusion form fails. All six grid points meet
the 1 − εrel = 0.95
target; the ratio
Nbound(dZ=2)/Nbound(dZ=1)
grows 5.17, 11.17, 23.52 at r = 4, 8, 16
— the exponential-in-dZ scaling made numerical.
Empirical common-sufficient clustering saturates the ε-covering
lower bound; escaping the curse requires inductive bias.
Rate–Distortion Pair — Theorem 2 witness
Closed-form Shannon R(D) plus explicit RD-optimal
test-channel construction, verified exactly on two finite sources with
Hamming distortion: uniform on 4 symbols
(R(D) = log2(n) − h(D) − D⋅log2(n − 1))
and Bernoulli(p = 0.3)
(R(D) = H2(p) − h(D)).
At D = 0 the encoder is minimal-sufficient and
R(0) equals the source entropy — the Theorem 1
anchor; at D = Dmax the encoder collapses
to a constant and R(Dmax) = 0. The
test channel achieves I(X; X̂) = R(D) at
every point in the achievable regime. All ten gates pass to
1e-9.
Linear-ICA Learnability — SIC-C-c, first class
First positive resolution of SIC-C-c (linear ICA, Hyvärinen–Oja 1999,
restated in our framework as Theorem 7). Fixed-seed
sklearn.decomposition.FastICA on X = A⋅Z
with random-orthogonal A and independent Laplace(0,1) latents, swept
(dZ, N) ∈ {2,4,6,8}×{200,500,1000,2000,5000,10000}.
Mean Amari at N = 10000 is ≤ 0.009
for every dZ; fitted polynomial exponent
b ≈ 0.06, gate b ≤ 3;
462× escape from Theorem 6's ε-covering bound.
Sparse Linear-ICA Learnability — SIC-C-c, second class
Second positive resolution of SIC-C-c: the sparse-linear-mixing class. Same shape as Instrument 8 but with A a sparse-orthogonal matrix at retention s ∈ {0.5, 0.25}. All four gates pass; sparser mixing gives modestly better recovery (better conditioning), fitted exponents b = 0.00 (s=0.5) and b = 0.51 (s=0.25), gate b ≤ 3. Caveat. This is sparse linear ICA, not the full nonlinear-mixing independent-mechanism analysis of Gresele et al. 2021 (which concerns the Jacobian-column geometry of a nonlinear mixing map). The IMA nonlinear instrument is a natural next addition.
iVAE Learnability — SIC-C-c, third class
Third positive resolution of SIC-C-c: auxiliary-variable identifiable ICA (Khemakhem–Kingma–Monti–Hyvärinen 2020). Latent Zi | U ∼ Laplace(μi(U), 1) conditional on a discrete auxiliary U; per-conditional FastICA aggregated by global Amari. Amari ≤ 0.033 at N = 10000 for every dZ ∈ {2, 4, 6}; fitted polynomial exponent b ≈ 1.23 (gate ≤ 4); escape ratio ∼ 23× from Theorem 6's bound.
Interventional CRL — SIC-C-c, fourth class
Fourth positive resolution of SIC-C-c: single-node interventional causal representation learning (Ahuja–Mahajan–Wang–Bengio 2022). For each latent component the observational distribution is replaced by a shifted intervention distribution; per-environment FastICA with an intervention-shift alignment achieves environment-consistency Amari ≤ 0.20 at the largest per-environment N, and the split strictly beats the pooled control — interventions carry genuine identifying information.
Compiler Tomography — Theorems CT-1, CT-2 witness
Companion to Compiler Tomography. MDL over a 25-point concern-parameter grid recovers the true compiler θ* = (0, 0) with rate ≥ 0.95 by N = 2000 paired samples (Theorem CT-1); the Boltzmann ecology update Kt+1 ∝ Kt⋅exp(β r) is monotone non-decreasing in per-fiber expected reward at every β ∈ {0.1, 1.0, 4.0}, and converges to the fiber argmax at β = 4 (Theorem CT-2).
Concern as Fiber Geometry — Theorems CG-1, CG-2 witness
Companion to
Concern as Fiber Geometry. On the exponential family with
sufficient statistic T, the empirical Fisher matrix agrees with the
predicted Covc,z[T] = β2⋅diag(sech2(βci))
at every grid point to ≈ 2⋅10−16 (Theorem CG-1);
discrete parallel transport of the concern one-form around a closed loop
yields holonomy exactly ε⋅A, where A is the
signed area (Theorem CG-2 — rectangle 0.3, triangle
0.15 at ε = 0.3).
Causal Semantics — Theorems CS-1, CS-2 witness
Companion to
Causal Semantics. On a world of 6 messages, 4 contexts, 4 future
states, Ψ-equivalence
m ∼Ψ m′ ⇔ p(·|c,m) = p(·|c,m′) ∀c
is a congruence (CS-1) and the meaning quotient yields
4 classes: {m0,m1}, {m2,m3}, {m4}, {m5}
— the coarsest common sufficient statistic on messages (CS-2). By construction
the co-occurrence partition {m0,m2,m4}, {m1,m3,m5} is orthogonal
to the meaning quotient.
Sufficient Antecedents — Theorem SA-1 witness
Companion to Sufficient Antecedents. Four canonical identifiability escape routes (linear ICA, sparse-linear ICA, auxiliary-variable iVAE, interventional CRL) each populate Theorem 4's antecedent by a local screen at every antecedent value; the intersection of local screens recovers the true latent Z exactly (4 blocks). Each row is one way of witnessing SA-1: local separation, cross-u coherence, and intersection-equals-Z.
SIC-A finite derivation — from posit to theorem
Companion to
Structural Intelligence — Foundations. On the 4-bit Boolean
world (16 states), the LR-vector partition (T1 + CS-2)
matches the joint-parity MSS partition bit-exactly: both partition the 16 states
into 4 fibres of size 4. This turns the master fibration from a
posited object into a derived one, Lean-verified as
sic_a_finite_discrete, zero new axioms.
SIC-C-c meta-theorem — c stable across K
Companion to
Structural Intelligence — Covering Learnability. The
meta-theorem prediction n ≥ c⋅K⋅log(K/δ)
at δ = 0.05 is fitted across
K ∈ {8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256}; the fitted constant
c stays inside [0.936, 0.995] across all six K
(span/mean ≈ 6%), and the empirical nemp
is tight to the bound by one sample. Lean-verified as
sicc_covering_meta, zero new axioms.
Abstraction Frontier — Theorems AF-1, AF-2 witness
Companion to
Abstraction Frontier. Enumerate 23 quotients on the 4-bit
Boolean world and score each on (task-sufficiency loss, dynamical closure,
coding cost, control regret). AF-1: the Pareto set is an antichain
of two points — constant and
joint(parity{0,1}, parity{2,3}). AF-2: because a common
sufficient statistic exists, the sufficient-only slice of the frontier
reduces to the true Z alone.
Alignment as Ensemble Governance — Theorems AG-1, AG-2 witness
Companion to Alignment as Ensemble Governance. On an exact 4-state Markov chain with per-step leakage β = 0.05, the survival probability Pr[q(Xt) ∈ V for all t ≤ T] matches the joint product-form bound (1−β)T exactly on V and is strictly larger on the coarser viable region V′ = Z — viability is inherited under coarsening (AG-2).
Theory Atlas — Theorems TA-1, TA-2 witness
Companion to
Theory Atlas. Three charts Ψ1, Ψ2, Ψ3
on overlapping contexts induce transitions Tij. TA-1: cocycle
Tik = Tjk ∘ Tij
⇔ a consistent global gluing exists. TA-2: the failure taxonomy
— glue, phase transition (support gap on one edge),
missing latent (full-rank discrepancy on every edge) — is
distinguished exactly by the transition-support signature.
Representation-Repair Calculus — Theorems RR-1, RR-2 witness
Companion to Representation-Repair Calculus. Eight canonical failure-signature → minimal-lift pairs: every broken representation strictly misses the invariant (RR-1), every lift is minimal (dropping any added feature breaks capture again), and two independent lifts compose on the product world (RR-2) — verified on a 48-state world.
Autocatalytic Artwork — Theorems AA-1, AA-2 witness
Companion to Autocatalytic Artwork. AA-1: the audience's mean predictive log-likelihood is monotone non-decreasing under successive posterior refinement, and the posterior on the true compiler concentrates from 1/3 → > 0.9 in six rounds. AA-2: Bayes posterior update on compilers is identically the Boltzmann ecology update at β = 1 — the autocatalytic dynamic is the compiler ecology of CT-2.
What this is and is not
- Is (derived): the master fibration exists as a mathematical object for any well-posed task (Halmos–Savage minimal sufficiency, Theorem 1) or, under a distortion budget, as the Shannon rate–distortion pair (Theorem 2), with the categorical restatement as an adjunction (Proposition 3). Cross-task stability is a conditional theorem (Theorem 4): a single quotient is sufficient for a task family if and only if the family shares a Markov screen. Instruments 1 and 4 are exact witnesses.
-
Is (derived, discrete case): Theorem 5 proves
that under separation and fibre balance, empirical common-sufficient
clustering recovers Z with probability
≥ 1 − εfromN ≥ ⌈c⋅M⋅ln(M/ε)⌉samples. Instrument 5 verifies the bound exactly. -
Is (derived, continuous case at resolution ε):
Theorem 6 reduces to Theorem 5 via ε-covering:
N = O(c(DZ/ε)dZ⋅dZ⋅log(…)), polynomial in1/εat fixed dZ, provably exponential in dZ at fixedε(ε-covering lower bound). Instrument 6 verifies the bound at every point of a (dZ, r) ∈ {1,2}×{4,8,16} grid. - Is (positively resolved for four inductive-bias classes so far): SIC-C-c — uniform polynomial-in-dZ learnability. Impossible without inductive bias (ε-covering lower bounds + Locatello 2019). Theorem 7 in the paper restates the classical positive resolutions inside four hypothesis classes, each with a numerical instrument in the Observatory: linear ICA (I8), sparse linear ICA (I9), auxiliary-variable iVAE (I10), and interventional CRL (I11). Additional classes — the full nonlinear IMA of Gresele et al. 2021, contrastive-learning identifiability, and others — are natural next instruments.
- Is not: a proof of universal agency or of infallibility. Cross-task stability holds only insofar as the world's tasks share a common latent generator (Theorem 4's antecedent); C1 is unproven; instrument 2's fidelity is unity by construction; nothing here licenses a claim of subjective experience.
-
On conscious / reliable agents: the honest target is a
Concerned Self-Modeling Core inside a
Proof-Carrying Reliability Shell — measurable functional selfhood
and formally bounded error, with
functional selfhood ≠ consciousnessandverified-bounded ≠ infallible.